Cost of production and performance
Cost of production and performance
Cost of production and performance
UK cattle facts and figures
Beef and lamb at a glance
Daily finished auction markets by region
Weekly finished auction markets by region
Weekly store markets by region
GB deadweight cattle prices by region
EU deadweight cattle and calf prices
Red meat country of origin audit
Cost of production benchmarks - suckler herds
UK sheep facts and figures
Beef and lamb at a glance
Daily finished auction markets by region
Weekly finished auction markets by region
Weekly store markets by region
Red meat country of origin audit
Cereals and Oilseeds at a glance
UK cereals supply and demand estimates
UK human and industrial cereal usage
Spring Planting and Variety Survey
Milk to feed price ratio
EU farmgate milk prices (incl. organic)
Cream income to a liquid processor
Dairy cattle and rearing calf prices
EU milk deliveries (incl. organic)
UK and EU cow numbers
UK pig facts and figures
GB deadweight pig prices (EU spec)
GB deadweight pig prices (UK spec)
Pig to feed wheat price ratio
UK pig numbers and holdings
UK pig meat marketing chain
EU pig slaughterings and production
Red meat country of origin audit
Rearing and finishing 7kg - 110kg
Cost of production in selected countries
Cost of production and net margins
Pig performance trends and COP sensitivity for feed and performance
Biopesticides or bioprotectants are crop protection agents based on micro-organisms or organic compounds.
Inspired by nature, biological products provide alternative options to conventional synthetic chemistry and are often compatible with integrated pest management (IPM).
Such alternatives also include biocontrols, which are based on organisms that predate or parasitise pests.
As with many crop production innovations, most initial activity in biopesticide application was in horticulture – especially in the relatively controlled environments afforded by protected systems.
The demand from growers for robust information on biopesticide use led AHDB to invest in work to tackle the unique complexities associated with this relatively new frontier.
Due to their biological nature, biopesticide performance is influenced by many factors, including humidity, temperature and the specifics of the pest population – such as its size and growth stage of individuals.
Learn about the AHDB biopesticide project (AMBER)
Another challenge is that biopesticides are relatively selective, with control often limited to one or few pests. To control a wider variety of pests, more sprays may be required – and this has financial, time, and, potentially, environmental implications.
For the last four years, a team at Stirling University has investigated this conundrum. Activity included a short project on the potential to tank mix microbial biopesticides that target different pests – with the final report due later this summer on the AHDB website.
This work warranted investigation because some research findings indicated that sprays based on more than one biopesticide could result in competition between the organisms and reduce their efficacy.
In the lab, the researchers grew tomatoes and aubergines (Figures 1 and 2) and infested them with either tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta) or greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum).
Plants were sprayed with individual or paired combinations of four horticultural microbial biopesticides (two that targeted the leafminer and two that targeted the whitefly).
The results were reassuring. In these tests, biopesticides were just as effective in combination as they were individually.
Tests included two combinations where both biopesticides targeted the same pest. This found no strong benefit associated with the ‘double-hit’ – insect mortality was no higher than the best product applied singularly.
Planned glasshouse-based trials will now test whether the good tank-mixing compatibility observed in the laboratory holds true under real-world conditions – but initial results are promising.
The researchers also conducted a literature review of tank-mixing strategies. They looked for evidence associated with the use of biopesticides (bacteria, viruses, fungi and nematodes) and biocontrol agents (such as parasitoid wasps).
This identified over 1,000 examples of related research, with the analysis surprising the researchers.
In general, insects simultaneously attacked by two pathogens or parasites were slightly more likely to die than when they only got a single infection. The double-hit effect was strongest when two very different pathogenic organisms were involved – such as a fungus and a bacterium.
Although it is not possible to predict what will happen in any given mix, the results suggest that biopesticide tank mixing may often work well.
Discussions with horticultural growers found that some already tank-mixed biopesticides, but none mixed microbial biopesticides to target more than one insect pest.
The research shows clear potential to increase the use of biopesticides in mixes. However, further trials are required before recommendations can be made.
While this project focused on protected horticultural crops, the results suggest that the use of multiple biopesticide products in open field settings could also be effective.
This article is based on information provided to AHDB by Matt Tinsley at Stirling University.
This project was part of an AHDB/BBSRC partnership that aimed to support the agricultural transition to net zero.
Project costs were met through BBSRC’s Farm Sustainability Fund. The partnership supported ten projects that addressed priorities identified by farmers, including ways to cut greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon storage.
Figure 1. Plants were grown in laboratory cages to assess multiple biopesticide treatments
Figure 2. The application of one of the biopesticide treatments on an aubergine plant in the laboratory
© Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2022 | All Rights Reserved
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, Warwickshire, CV8 2TL